Final Take on Economic and Poverty Impact of Nepal Earthquake
Two months after the catastrophic 7.8 magnitude earthquake that struck Nepal on 25 April, the government and development partners including ADB are now publishing the definitive report on the tremor’s impact.
Two months after the catastrophic 7.8 magnitude earthquake struck Nepal on 25 April, the government and development partners including ADB are now publishing the definitive report on the tremor’s impact.
The executive summary and Volume A of the Post Disaster Needs Assessment, or PDNA is already out, and we are still awaiting Volume B. Information from the full set of reports, including a part of the aid pledged during the reconstruction conference, will feed into the government’s budget for next year expected to be announced by July 15.
Impact on GDP growth
The PDNA says the earthquake lowered GDP growth by over 1.5 percentage points from an estimate of 4.6% in a no-earthquake scenario in fiscal year 2015 (which ends 15 July 2015). This new estimate is in line with the lower growth forecast we mentioned in our blog post on 22 May.
Figure 1: GDP growth (basic prices), %. Source: Central Bureau of Statistics.
Although the earthquake struck Nepal in the tenth month of FY2015, the impact on GDP growth is sizable especially on the services sector, which is now expected to grow by 3.9% compared to 6% in a no-earthquake scenario. Wholesale and retail trade; tourism (including air transport, and hotel and restaurant businesses); real estate, renting and business activities; and education sub-sectors are the most affected.
The agriculture sector is expected to grow by 1.9% and industry by 2.7%, down from earlier no-earthquake scenario forecasts of 3% and 3.5%, respectively. The sharp drop in agricultural output is primarily due to the negative impact of delayed and weak monsoon in the first half of FY2015, and later the loss of livestock due to the earthquake.
The slowdown in the industry sector is due to the drastic drop in quarrying, manufacturing and construction. Trade in stones, aggregates, sand and soil extraction has slowed down in affected districts, and the moratorium on construction activity till mid-July 2015 will also affect the sector. In manufacturing, there has been significant physical damage to manufacturing buildings and equipment, there is a labor shortage and also weak demand. Meanwhile, construction has slowed due to the policy to temporarily halt construction activities and the low production of construction materials, among others).
Figure 2: Gross value added loss in FY 2015 ($ million). Source: Central Bureau of Statistics.
Nepal’s GDP is estimated to be $21.6 billion in FY2015 ($371 million less than what would have been in a no-earthquake scenario). The loss amounts to 1.5% of GDP. About 62% of the total gross value added (GVA) loss is accounted for by the services sector.
Impact on per capita income
The PDNA estimates per capita income will decrease by $23 to $762 in FY2015 compared to the no-earthquake scenario of $785. Real per capita income, which takes inflation into account, is forecast to increase by just 0.6% against 3.6% had there been no earthquake.
Figure 3: Nominal per capita GDP ($). Source: Central Bureau of Statistics.
Impact on poverty
The report shows that the income shock from the earthquake will likely push an additional 700,000-982,000 people below the poverty line. This translates into an additional 2.5-3.5% of the estimated population in 2015 pushed into poverty on top of the 21% who were estimated to be living below the poverty line. About 50-70% of the additional poor live in the rural central hills and mountains, where the vulnerability prior to the earthquake was already high. The income shock will largely be felt though the loss of income-generating opportunities and livelihoods including death and injuries to primary wage earners and the loss of housing, productive assets like seeds, livestock, and farm equipment, and of durable assets such as assorted household items.
Beyond this monetary-based poverty estimate, a larger impact can be expected when factoring in multidimensional poverty, which includes additional factors such as water and sanitation services, disruption of schools and health services and the possibility of an uptick in food insecurity. The poor and vulnerable are particularly dependent on local infrastructure such as roads, bridges, health posts, and schools for access to labor and commodity markets, and for accumulation of human capital (especially those of children). Reviving local economic activities and the resumption of basic public services along with an accelerated implementation of reconstruction projects will be critical to make up for the set back on poverty reduction caused by the earthquake.