Strong Institutions Shield Emerging Markets from US Monetary Shocks
The global impact of US monetary policy significantly affects capital flows and credit growth in emerging markets, highlighting the importance of macroeconomic fundamentals and institutional quality in determining resilience during different monetary cycles.
The United States dollar continues to reign supreme. The dollar dominates international trade and financial transactions, and the foreign exchange reserves of central banks.
As such, US monetary policy still drives global financial cycles, impacting global capital flows and credit growth. Dollar dominance ultimately limits the policy choices of financially integrated emerging markets.
The global influence of US monetary policy was especially visible during the seven years of easing (2007–2014) induced by the global financial crisis and its aftermath. This was followed by 4.5 years of tightening that was kicked off by the 2013 “taper tantrum.”
Subsequently, three years of easing (2019–2022), largely induced by the COVID-19 pandemic, eventually led to a major tightening beginning in February 2022 as a delayed reaction to rapidly rising inflation in the US.
As US monetary policy shifts have global repercussions, capital markets in emerging economies are often vulnerable to destabilizing flight-to-quality outflows during periods of heightened uncertainty.
They are also vulnerable to volatile search-for-yield inflows during periods of low returns in the US. Large inflows were observed when the Federal Reserve's massive monetary easing pushed the federal funds rate close to zero in the wake of the global financial crisis.
At a broader level, these episodes placed increasing pressure on the macroeconomic outlook of emerging markets and raised their risk profile. They also impacted emerging market currencies, debt repayments, and capital flows.
A natural question that arises is why some emerging markets are more resilient and/or less vulnerable to US monetary policy cycles, an issue examined in the study The Performance of Emerging Markets During the Fed’s Easing and Tightening Cycles: A Cross-Country Resilience Analysis by Joshua Aizenman, Donghyun Park, Irfan A. Qureshi, Gazi Salah Uddin and Jamel Saadaoui.
One approach is to empirically assess whether macroeconomic variables such as debt levels and institutional variables such as degree of corruption can explain an emerging market’s resilience during each cycle.
The study also takes a holistic approach to measuring emerging market resilience by focusing on the bilateral exchange rate against the US dollar; exchange rate market pressure; and the country-specific Morgan Stanley Capital International Index (MSCI).
In addition, the role of policy factors such as exchange rate regime type and inflation targeting were also examined.
At the broadest level, the existing research finds that macroeconomic and institutional variables are indeed significantly associated with emerging market performance. Furthermore, the determinants of resilience differ during tightening versus easing cycles, and the quality of institutions matters even more during difficult times.
We found that cross-country differences in ex-ante macroeconomic fundamentals and institutional variables can help explain the differences in performance and resilience of a large cross-section of emerging markets during different US monetary cycles.
These determinants differ during tightening versus easing cycles. The significance of ex-ante institutional variables increased during the monetary cycles triggered by the global financial crisis and the taper tantrum. This suggests that strong institutions matter more during difficult times.
To address these issues, emerging market policymakers should understand that macroeconomic variables such as the amount of international reserves, the current account balance, and inflation are all important determinants of an emerging market’s resilience to US monetary policy swings.
This reinforces the conventional wisdom that strong fundamentals protect emerging markets in the face of large external shocks.
In particular, policymakers should continue to focus on vulnerable sovereigns with large external debt obligations and economies with highly leveraged property markets and weaknesses in capital markets that are typically challenged by the changing interest rate landscape.
The borrowing costs of these economies might rise if there is a sudden deterioration in global financial conditions, further worsening their fragile fundamentals.
To safeguard their economies against the volatility induced by US monetary policy, emerging market policymakers must prioritize strengthening macroeconomic fundamentals and institutions. This will help ensure long-term financial stability and foster sustained economic growth amidst the challenges posed by global financial fluctuations.