Updated Economic Outlook Following Nepal’s Earthquake – Prices, Trade, Budget
Inflation is expected to rise significantly after the recent earthquake in Nepal, which will also have an impact on the country’s external sector balance and fiscal balance. Check out our updated analysis.
In a blog post on 1 May, we presented a quick preliminary analysis of the economic impact of the 7.8 magnitude earthquake that struck Nepal on 25 April.
A subsequent 7.3 magnitude aftershock on 12 May brought further casualties and inflicted added damage to property. The government has declared 14 districts as severely affected (mostly in the central and western regions) although the earthquakes have affected about two-thirds of Nepal’s 75 districts.
This piece updates the analysis by incorporating data and information from the last three weeks.
Lower agricultural output in the first nine months of fiscal year (FY) 2015 (ending 15 July 2015) was already exerting upward pressure on food prices. This is being compounded by the depletion of household food stocks and farmland in severely affected areas, as well as supply disruptions along the major trading routes with the People’s Republic of China. With the onset of the monsoon, further supply disruptions are likely due to landslides.
These two factors will likely increase prices of cereal, vegetables, and fruits, pushing up food inflation to double-digit levels despite lower fuel prices exerting less pressure on farm machinery, irrigation, and food processing costs. Similarly, non-food inflation— mainly from imported items—will be boosted by supply disruptions, which intensified after the strong aftershocks. The combined impact of these two factors will push up headline inflation in FY2015 to 8.2% from the 7.7% level forecast in ADB’s March Asian Development Outlook (ADO) 2015. Inflation in FY2014 was 9.1%.
In FY2016, the projected slowdown in agricultural output due to a likely sub-normal monsoon, higher aggregate demand from cash transfers to cover basic housing requirement, government, temporary jobs during rehabilitation and reconstruction, and production bottlenecks (arising from the long running supply-side constraints such as the lack of adequate electricity, labor shortages and low productivity, etc.) will likely push headline inflation to around 8.5%.
Source: Nepal Rastra Bank; ADB Nepal Resident Mission staff estimates
External sector balance
The ADO 2015 forecast Nepal’s current account balance at 2.7% of GDP for FY2015, primarily due to the slowdown in official remittance inflows. In fact, official remittance inflows in the first 9 months of FY2015 decelerated much more than our earlier estimate. Hence, despite the uptick in inflows immediately after the earthquake, the rate of annual inflows in FY2015 will still be lower than in FY2014.
Meanwhile, the trade deficit is expected to widen further as exports slow and imports register modest growth, primarily dragged by higher non-oil imports, and despite lower oil imports which constitute about 20% of total merchandise imports. The impact of the earthquake on the agricultural and manufacturing sectors will also hit merchandise exports in the remaining months of FY2015.
Furthermore, tourism earnings will also take a hit as mountaineering and trekking activities have been closed for the rest of this season. Popular trekking routes, world famous heritage sites, and many hotels have either been destroyed, require major repair, or need careful structural assessment.
The combined effects of these circumstances will likely bring down Nepal’s current account surplus to about 1% of GDP this fiscal year, down from 4.7% of GDP in FY2014.
In FY2016, despite an expected moderate rebound in remittance inflows, substantially higher imports will likely push the current account to a deficit of 1.5% of GDP. Exports will likely rise marginally—mainly due to a rise in manufacturing output next year—but imports will likely increase drastically as a lower agricultural harvest will likely mean higher food imports to meet demand.
Rehabilitation and reconstruction efforts will also require importing items ranging from industrial inputs to heavy machinery and construction materials. This will further widen the trade deficit.
Meanwhile, the picture on migration (and subsequently workers’ remittances) is unclear as of now, but a highly probable scenario is that there will be a net increase in the number of workers leaving the country if reconstruction projects are slow to get off the ground, and that results in a lack of job opportunities. The severely affected 14 districts account for about 18% of total migrant outflows and 13.6% of total remittance inflows. Overall, the current account balance and the balance of payments will largely depend on imports and remittances inflows.
Source: Department of Foreign Employment, World Bank, ADB Nepal Resident Mission staff estimates
About 60% of total capital spending typically happens in the last three months of the fiscal year. The earthquake and subsequent aftershocks have delayed planned project implementation, and forced the government to realign its focus toward immediate relief and rehabilitation efforts before the onset of the monsoon. Any perceived excess funds that are unlikely to be spent this year have already been diverted for this purpose. The 14 severely affected districts together account for about 58% of total capital spending in the country. Hence, overall capital spending will fall below the government’s NRs117 billion ($1.84 billion) target set for FY2015. In fact, actual capital spending has averaged just 76% of budgeted allocations in the past three years. Recurrent spending will likely be over 95% of budgeted allocation (about 65% of allocation).
Meanwhile, the disruption to regular economic activities has slowed demand for both domestic and imported goods, which has undermined overall revenue mobilization. Import-based revenue accounts such as custom duties, value-added tax and excise on imports only account for about 45% of total revenue.
Source: Ministry of Finance
Consequently, the government is projecting a revenue shortfall of about $300 million (against a FY2015 revenue target of $4.4 billion, which includes grants as well). To cover a part of the immediate relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction costs, the government is raising about $500 million from bill and bond sales in the next two months. Hence, a marginal slowdown in expenditure, a bigger-than-expected revenue shortfall, and a comparatively large volume of domestic borrowing in the next 2 months will likely increase the fiscal deficit to about 1% of GDP this year, up from 0.1% of GDP in FY2014.
In FY2016, revenue will likely rebound modestly with an increase in consumption of imported and domestic items. Meanwhile, capital spending will increase to cover rehabilitation and reconstruction costs. The government has estimated the preliminary cost of reconstruction at $5 billion to $10 billion spread over a few years. Consequently, the fiscal deficit will likely be higher than 2% of GDP in the next few years. Its exact level will be contingent upon the contribution from development partners, mainly grants. Meanwhile, the government has set up a National Reconstruction Fund of $2 billion to which it has contributed $200 million. It hopes to raise the rest from donors during an international donors’ conference expected to be held in coming months.
This is the third of a series of 3 post-disaster blog posts about the economic impact of Nepal’s earthquake by ADB’s chief economics officer in the country.